Ashley St. Clair Sues Elon Musk over Sole Custody

A prominent influencer, Ashley St. Clair is now heard to be suing the billionaire Elon Musk for the sole custody of Elon’s 13th child which he shares with Ashley.

Image Credit: India Today

In a development that has drawn widespread public interest, a well-known political influencer has filed for sole custody of her five-month-old son, reportedly fathered by a globally recognized tech billionaire. The legal petition, submitted in Manhattan Supreme Court on February 21, 2025, also seeks to establish paternity and determine appropriate child support arrangements. According to court documents, the mother claims that the tech mogul has had minimal involvement in the child’s life since his birth in September 2024. She alleges that despite repeated efforts to engage him in the child’s care, the billionaire has only met the infant three times over the past five months. Her legal team argues that his lack of involvement, combined with his extensive professional commitments, leaves her as the primary caregiver, making sole custody the best option for the child’s well-being.

The filing highlights concerns that the father’s demanding career, involving multiple companies and ventures, makes it difficult for him to provide the stability and consistent presence that the child needs. Additionally, the documents note that the influencer has been the one solely responsible for meeting the child’s emotional, physical, and financial needs thus far. The situation escalated after the filing of the custody petition, with the mother’s attorney alleging that the billionaire responded by drastically reducing financial support for the child. This alleged move is described by her legal team as a form of retaliation against her for pursuing legal action to formalize custody and establish paternity.

Further complicating the situation, the tech mogul’s legal team reportedly filed an emergency request for a gag order to prevent the mother from discussing the case publicly. However, the judge denied the urgency of the request, leaving the application pending. The influencer’s legal team argues that transparency in the proceedings is essential, given the public nature of both parties’ profiles and the broader implications of the case. While the tech billionaire has not made any public statements regarding the lawsuit, sources familiar with the matter suggest that his legal team is focusing on containing media coverage and ensuring that details of the case remain private. Motions have reportedly been filed to seal court documents, a move that the mother’s representatives are opposing, citing the importance of public accountability.

Legal experts observing the case suggest that this strategy is aimed at minimizing public scrutiny, particularly given the billionaire’s already high-profile public persona. However, critics argue that sealing the documents could deprive the public of critical information about a case that has potential implications for high-profile custody disputes. The case has sparked intense public interest due to the prominence of both parties involved. The influencer, known for her vocal political commentary and strong social media presence, has a significant following that has closely followed the developments. On the other hand, the tech entrepreneur’s reputation for his business acumen and controversial public statements has also added to the intrigue surrounding the case.

Public opinion has been sharply divided, with supporters of the mother praising her efforts to secure a stable environment for her child, while others argue that the billionaire’s contributions to the child’s future cannot be dismissed.